As a general guideline, you should feel free to submit your work to CGPT and ask it to analyze, critique, and offer suggestions for improvement. Use it to CHECK the work you’ve already done, not to DO the work you’re too lazy to do.
Here is an example. I pasted the text of a recent article I wrote into CGPT with the prompt: “Analyze and make suggestions for improvement”. You can read that article here. Below you can see what CGPT returned as a response:
Your reflections on using ChatGPT in pastoral and educational contexts are insightful and offer a balanced perspective on the ethical use of technology like AI. It's clear that you are considering the potential benefits and challenges associated with integrating AI tools into your work as a pastor and educator. Here are some points of analysis and suggestions for improvement regarding your thoughts:
Ethical Considerations:
Your comparison between using ChatGPT to write sermons and using pre-made sermon manuscripts from the internet is apt. You emphasize that both approaches are unethical because they don't reflect the personal study and connection with the scripture that should be a foundation for pastoral work. This connection to the scriptures is a crucial point to reinforce when discussing the ethics of using AI tools in pastoral tasks.
Educational Awareness:
Your mention of your daughter's high school class and the teacher's "No CGPT" approach highlights an important aspect of this issue. Educators should indeed be proactive in teaching students how to use AI technologies ethically and responsibly. You've rightly advocated for the development of an "AI Ethical Use Policy" as a guideline for educators. Sharing real-world examples of such policies, if available, could reinforce your point.
Balancing Efficiency and Integrity:
Your example of using ChatGPT to create a devotional highlights the temptation to take shortcuts in pastoral work. By addressing this example, you're providing practical insight into the potential pitfalls and offering a way to maintain integrity while leveraging AI tools. Emphasizing the importance of personal study and growth through the process of crafting sermons and devotionals could further strengthen your argument.
AI as a Tool for Improvement:
Your suggestion to use AI as a tool for analyzing, critiquing, and offering suggestions for improvement rather than generating the entire content is a valuable perspective. This encourages a collaborative approach between human creativity and AI assistance, fostering growth and refinement while preserving the authenticity of the work.
Embracing Technology Responsibly:
Your concluding thoughts about embracing technology while maintaining discernment and ethical guidelines align with the broader discussion about AI adoption. Emphasizing that technology should enhance rather than replace human effort resonates with the concept of responsible AI integration in various fields.
A Call to Early Adoption and Ethical Guidelines:
Your encouragement to engage with AI technology as early adopters to explore its potential and establish ethical guidelines is forward-thinking. This attitude aligns with the idea that responsible innovation and adaptation can lead to positive advancements while avoiding pitfalls.
Overall, your article offers a well-considered perspective on the ethical use of AI in pastoral and educational contexts. To enhance it further, you might consider incorporating specific examples of ethical AI guidelines that are already being implemented in various industries. Additionally, sharing personal experiences or anecdotes related to the challenges and benefits of integrating AI tools into your pastoral work could make your insights even more relatable and impactful.
What do you think? Is this helpful feedback?
Below is a QR code to a WhatsApp group that you can join. Via this group, I will send links to my posts and you will also have an opportunity to send comments or messages or questions to me directly. To get started, simply click the graphic or scan the QR code below.